• Was this page helpful?
Intuit Blog
|
Support
Point of Sale
|
GoPayment
|
Payroll
|
Quickbooks
|
Website Services
Intuit
Sign In
Register
QuickBooks General Forum QuickBooks Payroll 3rd Party Apps that work with QuickBooks QuickBooks Accountant Edition QuickBooks Online for Accounting Professionals QuickBooks Enterprise Solutions QuickBooks Point of Sale
ProAdvisor Program & Certification
ProSeries DMS ProSeries Community
Lacerte DMS Lacerte Community
Intuit Tax Online Tax Research for Lacerte and ProSeries Tax Import for Lacerte and ProSeries Intuit Practice Management EasyACCT Intuit Statement Writer
Starting and Managing Your Practice Classifieds Intuit ProConnection Newsletter Intuit Academy Training Your Peers Recommend
  • QuickBooks & Payroll
  • ProAdvisors
  • Lacerte
  • ProSeries
  • Productivity Tools
  • Training & Resources
Leaderboard
Hide Advanced Search
 
All of these words
Any of these words
This exact phrase
None of these words
In this forum
With posts written by
With posts from
to
mm/dd/yy
mm/dd/yy
Show Advanced Search
Home   Help for Accountants   Tax - ProSeries   Tax - ProSeries Community  
hide
01/26/2012 at 02:08PM PST
We’ve seen a scam e-mail regarding Intuit tax information floating around today. This e-mail was not sent or authorized by Intuit. If you ever wonder whether an e-mail from Intuit is real or fake, please refer to the link below.

Thank you

http://security.intuit.com/security-alerts.php
1
525
ce6FyoX2ir3QjyacfA8pyY
Subscribe RSS
Singapore
Singapore
Questions asked: 30
Questions answered: 9
Points earned: 10
Singapore
Singapore
Questions asked: 30
Questions answered: 9
Points earned: 10
Contributor
11/01/09 7:48pm PST
Viewed by asker 11/03/09 9:15pm PST

Joint Venture Schedule C Rental Activity

 

A new client has filed Schedule E for the past 3 years to report a short term rental on the Maine Coast.  During the winter it rents for a few months at a time, but in the summer it rents for weekends/weeks at a time and they provide all utilities, furnishings, linens, and a maid service between stays.   The state of Maine taxes the two periods differently.  They collect sales tax on the "itinerant rental" periods in the summer.  They are seeking advice on amending returns to correct this.  After depreciation all years will be losses.  Any comments from the community on this?  Also, does ProSeries have a check box that will split the schedule C or do I have to set up two and enter the date twice (splitting it 50/50)?  Thanks!

Submit a reply to this question
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
 Report Abuse
14 Replies
PhoebeRoberts
PhoebeRoberts
Questions asked: 80
Questions answered: 9003
Points earned: 32986
Accountant Community AllStar
Accountant Community AllStar
Advisory council of Accountant community power users.
PhoebeRoberts
PhoebeRoberts
Questions asked: 80
Questions answered: 9003
Points earned: 32986
Accountant Community AllStar
11/02/09 7:15am PST

 Have you calculated the average period of customer use per Reg Sec 1.469-1(e)(3)(iii)?  If it's rented close to year-round, I'm guessing Sch E may be correct.  (Cleaning between stays, as opposed to daily maid service, IMHO would not rise to the level of "significant personal services," and linens / furniture / utilities aren't "personal services" at all.  So you've only got a 7-day hurdle, not a 30-day hurdle.)

If I wanted phone calls, my phone number would be in my profile. If you have a question, post it in the applicable forum.
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
0
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
Accountant Man
Accountant Man
Questions asked: 128
Questions answered: 9845
Points earned: 27330
Accountant Community AllStar
Accountant Community AllStar
Advisory council of Accountant community power users.
Accountant Man
Accountant Man
Questions asked: 128
Questions answered: 9845
Points earned: 27330
Accountant Community AllStar
11/02/09 7:18am PST

The quick answer is no PS will not split it for you. You should put half on Sch C for the summer daily rentals and half on Sch E for the monthly rentals. You will have to enter the asset w/s for depreciation on each C and E, and put 50% in as the amount to be depreciated.

Assuming you meet the tests as stated by Phoebe.

If you use Pro Series Basic I might not be able to help you. If you use Turbo Tax I might refuse to help you. All others, watch out! ;-)
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
1
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
PhoebeRoberts
PhoebeRoberts
Questions asked: 80
Questions answered: 9003
Points earned: 32986
Accountant Community AllStar
Accountant Community AllStar
Advisory council of Accountant community power users.
PhoebeRoberts
PhoebeRoberts
Questions asked: 80
Questions answered: 9003
Points earned: 32986
Accountant Community AllStar
11/02/09 8:56am PST

 I don't have any particular knowledge in this area, but it's not clear to me that you'd split it at all.  You're either over 7 days, considering the year as a whole, in which case it all goes on E (or E-equivalent, see below).  Or you're under 7 days, considering the year as a whole, in which case it all goes on a normal C.  The sales tax issue isn't relevant for the 1040.

Note also that the proper way to show a husband-wife joint venture real estate rental, which would go on Sch E if owned 100% by either, is 2 Schedules C with the box on Part 1, Line 1 checked, no SE tax, and the "normal" limitations on rental losses.  Assuming that the presentation on the prior returns was otherwise-acceptable, I personally would not be amending to switch from Sch E to Sch C just to fine-tune the presentation.

If I wanted phone calls, my phone number would be in my profile. If you have a question, post it in the applicable forum.
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
0
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
Singapore
Singapore
Questions asked: 30
Questions answered: 9
Points earned: 10
Singapore
Singapore
Questions asked: 30
Questions answered: 9
Points earned: 10
Contributor
11/02/09 5:47pm PST

Thank you for your prompt advice.  I'm getting more detail on the duration of the rentals, but likely given the longer rentals in the winter, the "average" will be more than 7 days and Schedule E is correct.  I don't understand your comment about SE tax though.  The rules state that SE is taxable for SE if (and only if) it is reported as a joint venture on schedule C.  Looks like I can avoid that in this case if we can get the 7 day average.    But just wondering for future cases in case I'm missing something.

Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
0
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
Mimbreno
Mimbreno
Questions asked: 38
Questions answered: 3662
Points earned: 11694
Accountant Community AllStar
Accountant Community AllStar
Advisory council of Accountant community power users.
Mimbreno
Mimbreno
Questions asked: 38
Questions answered: 3662
Points earned: 11694
Accountant Community AllStar
11/02/09 8:03pm PST

Phoebe is referring to a husband - wife joint real estate venture. It is properly reported on 2 schedule Cs rather than 1 schedule E and there is a box to check in Part I line 1 of schedule C to indicate that it is a joint real estate venture not subject to SE tax. If the average rental period is less than 7 days then you would not check this box since the income would be subject to SE tax.

I am not young enough to know everything. - Oscar Wilde
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
1
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
Singapore
Singapore
Questions asked: 30
Questions answered: 9
Points earned: 10
Singapore
Singapore
Questions asked: 30
Questions answered: 9
Points earned: 10
Contributor
11/03/09 3:04am PST

Wow, now I am really confused.  So, no need to amend the old years just to fix the presentations, but, going forward they should be reporting on two schedule Cs as an "E" equivalent (i.e. no SE Tax)?  This would mean that the majority of married couples with regular rentals would be filing two schedule Cs instead of E?  I have yet to see any prior year return prepared by CPAs done this way.  (My practice specializes in Expat returns, so I am mostly taking on cases for folks who move overseas and are changing from their state-side CPAs).  All the MFJ rentals are on Schedule Es. 

Does the IRS really care about this?  If so, why are so many CPAs filing on Schedule E instead of C for their clients?  (I suppose that is a loaded question, but I'm just trying to get a handle on the situation as I made the same mistake and will need to convert over all the rentals next year to make sure I do this correctly.)  Thanks for sharing your ideas.

Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
0
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
ArchieLeach
ArchieLeach
Questions asked: 332
Questions answered: 8059
Points earned: 8286
Accountant Community AllStar
Accountant Community AllStar
Advisory council of Accountant community power users.
ArchieLeach
ArchieLeach
Questions asked: 332
Questions answered: 8059
Points earned: 8286
Accountant Community AllStar
11/03/09 6:29am PST

>>>Does the IRS really care about this? If so, why are so many CPAs filing on Schedule E instead of C for their clients?<<<

I suspect that most CPAs (myself included) didn't know that you could suppress the SE tax calculation on Sch C. 

If I correctly understand your situation (a dubious assumption), the US tax is the same either way. If so, there is no reason to amend just to pick up style points from the IRS.  Maine could be a problem, but only if the tax differential is material -- I'd say, in the hundreds of dollars.

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." ~ Winston Churchill
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
0
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
NLevy
NLevy
Questions asked: 2
Questions answered: 255
Points earned: 628
NLevy
NLevy
Questions asked: 2
Questions answered: 255
Points earned: 628
Contributor
11/03/09 7:23pm PST
Best Answer - Chosen by the Community

 OK. I am finding errors in almost every answer. Try this, and the other answerers can pick me apart if I haven't got it right.

All past years are losses, subject to passive loss rules. The only thing you'd be adding is the sales tax expense - which is a federal expense. Presuming this amount is not terrible large the cost of preparing amendments will be more than the throw away sales tax losses. If not, amend using the procedure below.

In ProSeries - to get it right for now and the future:

Considering that the info provided by questioner shows rental use and not a personal vacation home or 2nd residence, I am taking this as a schedule E item and sch C is not involved.

In the Proseries E worksheet - check the box - 1b "jointly owned" and if applicable the box for material participation.

Now you will create (on one page):

One Rental Expense Statement - in any program not Proseries. I recomend excel. You will list all expenses excluding depreciation that apply to the one property.

One Rental Income Statement - with two parts:

Part 1. will state "Monthly Rental - Not Subject to Maine Sales Tax" and  "Length of Time - Months" = X  rental income.

Part 2. will state "Itinerant Rental - Subject to Maine Sales Tax" and  "Length of Time - Days" = Y rental income.

Now use the formula function, or a calculator, to attribute the Expense statement total, by length of time, to Part 1 and Part 2, and pay the Maine sales tax. Remember that if the Maine sales tax is paid after the year closes, then the current year expense is from the prior year taxes due. Be sure to track for the future.

Back to ProSeries - Create 2 Sch. E's, fill in title and check boxes as I stated above, label each E with the Property name and the label of either part 1 or 2. Enter income for each the same way. Enter allocated expense amount for each, on line 18.

line 18. Other expense, label - use ***Special trick **** Right click on the box and select "add/edit note". Switch to your prepared statement, select it, right click and choose copy (or use any copy command). Go back to the open ProSeries note and right click and "paste". Check the box to "print this note as part of tax return for filing". Remember to put note in both E's but you can set only one to print, or print both and include one with Maine return, as appropriate.

Enter depreciation in each E, being sure to check 50% box.  Add the sales tax expense in the Line 16b Other tax expense for the Itinerant E.

All correct. Include federal copy with Maine tax return. 

 

NanseaLevy
- If we knew what it was we're doing, it would not be called Research. - Albert Einstein
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
5
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
Singapore
Singapore
Questions asked: 30
Questions answered: 9
Points earned: 10
Singapore
Singapore
Questions asked: 30
Questions answered: 9
Points earned: 10
Contributor
11/03/09 9:15pm PST

Thank you for the time and thought you put into this.  The property is not their second home or vacation property.  Just a house they bought and rent.   As I said in an earlier posting, I have yet to see a return prepared by another preparer (independent CPA, EA or Big 4) that puts a regular rental property onto Schedule C as a joint venture, but I wasn't sure what kind of animal of was dealing with here b/c of the short term periods.

Thanks for excel trick too.  Did not know that!

Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
0
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
PhoebeRoberts
PhoebeRoberts
Questions asked: 80
Questions answered: 9003
Points earned: 32986
Accountant Community AllStar
Accountant Community AllStar
Advisory council of Accountant community power users.
PhoebeRoberts
PhoebeRoberts
Questions asked: 80
Questions answered: 9003
Points earned: 32986
Accountant Community AllStar
11/04/09 8:18am PST

 Nansea (since you asked for a pick-apart ;) ), you do technically get 2 Schedules C for a husband-wife real estate joint venture.  Sch E is technically incorrect.

As I mentioned originally, I personally would not amend for the presentation issue.  Since the Sch E isn't linked to any particular name (husband, wife, or both), I personally have no issue with anyone putting the activity on one Sch E, rather than 2 Schedules C.  We've discussed it in our local practice group, and the consensus seemed to be "Since you get the same answer either way, and two Schs C is stupid and more effort and increases the chances for error, I'm not going to do it right."  But the Sch E presentation is technically wrong.

If I wanted phone calls, my phone number would be in my profile. If you have a question, post it in the applicable forum.
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
0
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
NLevy
NLevy
Questions asked: 2
Questions answered: 255
Points earned: 628
NLevy
NLevy
Questions asked: 2
Questions answered: 255
Points earned: 628
Contributor
11/04/09 10:10am PST

 Phoebe: With all due respect, I think you should discuss this further in your group. Generally, it's not a good idea to "choose" to do the return "wrong" because there actually are good reasons for the right way. All tax law (from the IRS)  is based on a simple clear intention. I know people don't want to believe that but if you find the intention you will find the right way to handle it. Occasionally the IRS screws it up temporarily but very soon either they, or Tax Court, fix it. (There are always a few exceptions.)

I believe that I am right, Sch. E is the correct form and Sch. C is not. In this case I have two points.

1. Just because the client has a definition doesn't make it the legal one according to income tax law - this is an ordinary single rental, not actually a "joint venture" business.

2. The reason for the new "husband and wife joint venture" rule is specifically to allow both to receive credit to their social security account.

http://www.irs.gov/businesses/...;

On May 25, 2007 the Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007 was signed into law and affect changes to the treatment of qualified joint ventures of married couples not treated as partnerships. The provision is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006.

..... This generally does not increase the total tax on the return, but it does give each spouse credit for social security earnings on which retirement benefits are based.

NanseaLevy
- If we knew what it was we're doing, it would not be called Research. - Albert Einstein
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
0
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
PhoebeRoberts
PhoebeRoberts
Questions asked: 80
Questions answered: 9003
Points earned: 32986
Accountant Community AllStar
Accountant Community AllStar
Advisory council of Accountant community power users.
PhoebeRoberts
PhoebeRoberts
Questions asked: 80
Questions answered: 9003
Points earned: 32986
Accountant Community AllStar
11/04/09 10:51am PST

Not sure why I'd want to discuss it further with our practice group, since it's not like I'm winning a convert in you any more than I did with them. ;)  Their tax returns are their tax returns, and if they choose to do 'em wrong-in-presentation-only, it's no skin off my nose.

Tax law isn't made by the IRS.  It's made by Congress, whose intentions I personally would not describe either as simple or as clear.  Yes, there are chunks of the tax code that you don't have to learn by rote, because they make sense if you understand the underlying logic.  But then there are things like the distinction between basis and at-risk, and self-employment tax for LLC members.  Or the situation where 3 Circuit Courts interpret a regulation one way, 2 interpret it another way, and your circuit hasn't ever considered it.

Having (eventually) gone back and re-read the OP more carefully, I think I saw the "split the Sch C" and mis-read it as "this is a joint activity," rather than "I want to put the >30 day piece on one Sch C and the <30 day piece on a second Sch C to make the state return easier."  So if this is rental real estate owned by one person, I agree that there's no QJV and no Sch C.

However, you also seem to have assumed jointly owned, and IMHO joint ownership of real estate is either a state-law general partnership (1065), or a qualified joint venture (2 Schs C on the 1040), or possibly-but-unlikely a true joint venture (similar to when unrelated people own undivided interests in the same piece of real estate, with the tenants paying each owner separately, and each owner separately paying the bills, which would be 2 Schs E on the 1040; one for each owner).  While I don't disagree that splitting the Social Security credit may have been one motivation for the QJV rules (fixing an inequity between community property states and non community property states IMHO being the overriding motivation), the Sch C instructions specifically anticipate that jointly-owned real estate would go on the Sch C.  Likewise, the Sch E instructions tell you that your options are QJV or 1065.

If I wanted phone calls, my phone number would be in my profile. If you have a question, post it in the applicable forum.
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
0
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
ArchieLeach
ArchieLeach
Questions asked: 332
Questions answered: 8059
Points earned: 8286
Accountant Community AllStar
Accountant Community AllStar
Advisory council of Accountant community power users.
ArchieLeach
ArchieLeach
Questions asked: 332
Questions answered: 8059
Points earned: 8286
Accountant Community AllStar
11/04/09 4:00pm PST

GEEEEEZ! Isn't it enough to just get the damn tax right?

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." ~ Winston Churchill
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
0
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
NLevy
NLevy
Questions asked: 2
Questions answered: 255
Points earned: 628
NLevy
NLevy
Questions asked: 2
Questions answered: 255
Points earned: 628
Contributor
11/04/09 7:57pm PST
Latest post

You're right Phoebe - Congress is as clear as mud ........ but the IRS is the only government agency that tries real hard to interpret things clearly to a specific intention - give us a portion of your work after the real cost it took to earn it and if you didn't have to work to earn it, you must be retired, so keep more. The rest of Treasury......not so good........SEC.... clearly influenced by high priced lawyers with lifetime perks (oh, that would be Congress)........ most regulators - the public goods are our buddies retirement....... and progressively worse. So, I do appreciate the IRS. Not that I'm prepared to let them get away with anything either.

And Archie, your point is exactly right - the important thing is exactly to get the damn tax right! People can continue to demand less corruption and more professionalism in the Congress that they vote in or out. But people should not have to pay taxes they don't owe out of fear or confusion; or pay less than is due, like the rest of us law abiding citizens have to, by cheating.

I'll study a little deeper in case I missed something in the actual new code. But a word about instructions - they are just the first draft. While they are meant to get you doing it right, over the years I've seen that they take a bit of public testing to get clear, and form instructions are never fully complete in themselves. And sometimes it's a public service to point that out to the forms drafters - very, very politely - but I've done it many times and watched them change the instructions over the course of a season or up to 3 years (sometimes more). The reason is - those forms have to get from the last session of Congress (October) to the software developers (used to be bulk printers) and available by the beginning of January. That's a tight turn around worthy of the best entrepreneurs.

NanseaLevy
- If we knew what it was we're doing, it would not be called Research. - Albert Einstein
Type of Abuse
Abusive behavior
 
Inaccurate information
 
Other (add details below)
 
Add Details
Cancel_sm Submit_sm
This helped me! Add 1 point.
0
Reply to this Answer
 Report Abuse
 
 
 
   
 
Submit a reply to this question
 
Subscribe RSS
Tags for this topic
    Help other users find this post by tagging it
Use commas to add multiple tags
Add tags
Latest Site Activity
Pause Feed
woneill1450
1 min ago
woneill1450
replied to
I just got a new computer, ...
Michelle Long CPA
2 mins ago
Michelle Long CPA
replied to
Using QB 2012 Accountant wi...
woneill1450
2 mins ago
woneill1450
replied to
Altering IIF file
Excelente
3 mins ago
Excelente
posted
this is ?what i get in fron...
notsoIntuitnow
4 mins ago
notsoIntuitnow
posted
Error Messages Galore!!
Product Resources
QuickBooks Tax Products Payroll ProAdvisor Program Training and Certification Feedback Survey
Resources: Find Local ProAdvisor Tax Almanac Practice Resources
Support: QuickBooks Lacerte ProSeries EasyACCT
Community Home Help with Intuit Products Start & Grow Your Business Help for Accountants Small Business Blog Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Watch us on YouTube Meet us on LinkedIn
About Intuit | Careers | Register Your QuickBooks | QuickBooks Affiliate Program | Privacy | Legal | Contact Us | Our Hosts
© 2012 Intuit, Inc. All rights reserved. Intuit and QuickBooks are registered trademarks of Intuit, Inc.
Terms and conditions, features, support, pricing and service options subject to change without notice.
TRUSTe - Privacy Standards and Principles
Intuit Websites - Create the perfect site
Intuit Small Business
QuickBooks Accounting Software
Small Business Grants
QuickBooks Online Accounting
Intuit Payroll Services
Intuit Credit Card Processing
Intuit Business Directory
Intuit GoPayment
Intuit Small Business Education
Intuit Small Business Blog
Love a Local Business